Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":68388,"date":"2024-09-01T09:29:33","date_gmt":"2024-09-01T09:29:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/?p=68388"},"modified":"2024-09-01T09:29:33","modified_gmt":"2024-09-01T09:29:33","slug":"meghans-colombia-tour-a-royal-drama-unfolds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/meghans-colombia-tour-a-royal-drama-unfolds\/","title":{"rendered":"Meghan’s Colombia Tour: A Royal Drama Unfolds"},"content":{"rendered":"

In a recent twist of events, Meghan Markle has found herself at the center of controversy during her tour in Colombia.<\/p>\n

According to royal expert Neil Sean, the Duchess of Sussex reportedly demanded that staff and event organizers refer to her exclusively as “Madam.”<\/p>\n

This insistence on strict protocol, which some may view as excessive, highlights the performative nature of the public life she and Prince Harry have chosen.<\/p>\n

Sean’s report indicates that Meghan’s demand is not just a matter of preference; it\u2019s an assertion of her status and authority, even amid a diplomatic visit.<\/p>\n

This behavior has ignited a firestorm of criticism, with many questioning whether such actions align with the image of humility and compassion that Meghan and Harry have worked so hard to present to the world.<\/p>\n

One royal commentator, who chose to remain anonymous, expressed disappointment, stating, “This is a far cry from the Meghan we’re used to seeing, the one who claims to be all about empowerment and equality.”<\/p>\n

Instead of focusing on the charitable causes they aimed to promote during their Colombian visit, the narrative has now shifted dramatically to Meghan’s diva-like demands.<\/p>\n

This isn’t the first time Meghan has faced accusations of entitled behavior.<\/p>\n

Reports have surfaced in the past detailing her clashes with palace staff over seemingly trivial matters, such as her preference for a specific type of avocado toast.<\/p>\n

These incidents have fueled the perception that Meghan prioritizes maintaining a polished image over engaging deeply with her charitable work.<\/p>\n

A former palace insider lamented, \u201cIt\u2019s a shame, really.<\/p>\n

Meghan has the potential to be a powerful force for good, but her apparent need for constant validation and deference seems to be getting in the way.\u201d Such sentiments reflect a growing concern among observers regarding how her actions affect her public persona.<\/p>\n

The recent uproar surrounding Meghan’s behavior has reignited discussions about the royal family’s role in contemporary society.<\/p>\n

Critics argue that the Sussexes’ insistence on strict protocols and titles clashes with the public’s desire for a more relatable royal family.<\/p>\n

One royal watcher pointed out, \u201cThe public wants to see a royal family that is in touch with the people, not one that is constantly demanding deference and special treatment.\u201d<\/p>\n

In contrast, supporters of the Sussexes defend this adherence to protocol as essential for upholding the dignity and traditions of the monarchy.<\/p>\n

A spokesperson for the couple, who wished to remain unnamed, stated, \u201cThese are centuries-old customs that serve an important purpose.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not about ego or diva behavior; it\u2019s about respecting the institution and the role that the royal family plays.\u201d<\/p>\n

Despite these arguments, the incident has further strained the public’s trust in Meghan and Prince Harry.<\/p>\n

The couple has long positioned themselves as advocates for social justice and equality, yet they now find themselves embroiled in a controversy that seems at odds with those very principles.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a recent twist of events, Meghan Markle has found herself at the center of controversy during her tour in Colombia. According to royal expert Neil Sean, the Duchess of Sussex reportedly…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":68387,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68388"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68388\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":68389,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68388\/revisions\/68389"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/68387"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}