Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-photo-album-plus-xsaw-gu-2/index.php:1) in /home/airglee/history.airglee.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":9650,"date":"2023-11-28T22:02:03","date_gmt":"2023-11-28T22:02:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/?p=9650"},"modified":"2023-11-28T22:02:03","modified_gmt":"2023-11-28T22:02:03","slug":"megan-carries-doll-instead-of-archie-in-controversial-photo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/megan-carries-doll-instead-of-archie-in-controversial-photo\/","title":{"rendered":"Megan Carries Doll Instead of Archie in Controversial Photo"},"content":{"rendered":"

In a recent photo that has sparked controversy, Megan, the Duchess of Sussex, was seen carrying a doll in an Ergo Baby Omni 360 carrier, rather than her son Archie.<\/p>\n

This has led to speculation and debate among many people who question whether Archie and his sister Lilibet are actually Megan’s biological children.<\/p>\n

The skepticism stems from the fact that Megan reportedly underwent a hysterectomy at the age of 28, making it seemingly impossible for her to conceive.<\/p>\n

The photo in question shows Megan walking on Vancouver Island in Canada, holding Archie in her arms while also managing the leashes of her two dogs.<\/p>\n

In one shot, she can be seen smiling directly at the camera, which some attribute to the presence of her PR team, who follow her around to capture her in a more positive light.<\/p>\n

However, it appears that Megan made a misstep with the harness she used to carry Archie.<\/p>\n

Numerous netizens have expressed concern for the well-being of both the baby and the dogs.<\/p>\n

Some have even gone so far as to suggest that Megan was actually carrying a doll instead of a real child.<\/p>\n

They argue that the way she held the baby in the Ergo Baby Omni 360 carrier was not only uncomfortable but also potentially unsafe for a real baby.<\/p>\n

One user, named Charsi, commented, “Those poor dogs, they look miserable, and that baby looks fake.<\/p>\n

Sorry, no real mom walks two dogs and stuffs a baby in like that.<\/p>\n

No way, no how, nope.”<\/p>\n

Another netizen shared a photo of the baby carrier that Megan was using, pointing out that the positioning of Archie seemed unnatural.<\/p>\n

They compared it to a corner doll, which is designed to appear as if a child is standing in the corner.<\/p>\n

This led to further speculation that the baby in the photo was not real.<\/p>\n

One user even questioned Megan’s mental state, suggesting that she may be suffering from a psychotic episode.<\/p>\n

The positioning of Archie in the carrier has also raised concerns among others.<\/p>\n

One user pointed out the discomfort and difficulty of walking with the weight of a child off-center and sliding out of one’s side.<\/p>\n

They argued that it would be impossible for Megan to walk without constantly adjusting the weight to be centered in front of her.<\/p>\n

Another user noticed that there were no visible diaper lines, which is typically noticeable through leggings on a baby.<\/p>\n

Aside from the controversy surrounding the baby, some individuals were also unhappy with Megan’s decision to share the photo.<\/p>\n

They criticized her for allegedly prioritizing privacy before stepping down as a royal, yet still posting public photos.<\/p>\n

Some even accused her of trying to steal the limelight from other members of the royal family who had engagements on the same day.<\/p>\n

While the debate continues to rage online, it remains unclear whether the baby in the photo is indeed Archie or a doll.<\/p>\n

However, the speculation and scrutiny surrounding Megan’s actions highlight the intense public interest in the lives of the royal family and the scrutiny they face at every turn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a recent photo that has sparked controversy, Megan, the Duchess of Sussex, was seen carrying a doll in an Ergo Baby Omni 360 carrier, rather than her son Archie. This has…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9649,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9650"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9650\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9651,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9650\/revisions\/9651"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}