In a recent Reddit thread, users delved into the topic of Meghan Markle’s previous work experience, particularly her time on the hit TV show Suits.
Many questioned her acting abilities, with some even labeling her as a “crappy actress.”
However, a few individuals went a step further, accusing Meghan of being a covert narcissist who presents a false image in public while harboring a completely different persona behind closed doors.
One user claimed that Meghan was involved in a sugar baby relationship with an older man named Fitzpatrick, who happens to be the owner of the establishment where she stayed.
The allegations were further fueled by photos of Meghan and actor Liam Neeson together at Fitzpatrick’s.
Although Neeson initially denied knowing her, the evidence suggests otherwise.
This raises questions about Meghan’s intentions and her association with powerful individuals like Fitzpatrick and Rory McIlroy.
For those unfamiliar with the term, a sugar baby is typically a younger person who receives financial support and other perks in exchange for a relationship with an older, wealthier individual.
It seems that Jon, the older man in question, believes that sugar babies can enjoy luxuries like designer handbags, rent payments, and even their children’s school fees covered by their wealthy benefactors.
Another shocking revelation came from Gina Torres, Meghan’s former co-star on Suits.
Torres claimed that Meghan would often bring Fitzpatrick to the set, openly flaunting their relationship.
She also accused Meghan of lying about her earnings from the show.
According to a source close to Meghan, she allegedly earned $50,000 per episode and continues to receive royalties when the series airs.
These royalties supposedly helped fund Meghan and Prince Harry’s new home in California.
However, industry experts dismiss the notion that Meghan’s royalties could significantly contribute to the costs of a home.
Typically, TV actors receive around 6% in royalties, unless they are making substantial amounts of money.
This means that even if Meghan earned $50,000 per episode, her royalties would not make a significant dent in purchasing a property.
To put things into perspective, Jennifer Aniston, a top-tier actress, received a staggering one million dollars per episode in the final season of Friends.
Even with her A-list status, Aniston now only receives a 2% royalty from the show’s annual earnings of billions.
Furthermore, Meghan lacks intellectual property rights, which means she does not benefit from merchandise sales such as action figures or calendars.
These rights typically belong to the studio for a specific period.
Therefore, the claims that Meghan single-handedly pays for their lavish Montecito mansion, valued at $5.4 million, seem far-fetched.
Realistically, Meghan may have had around 1 to 1.4 million dollars in her bank account when she met Prince Harry.
While these allegations and revelations about Meghan Markle’s past continue to circulate, it is important to approach them with caution.
As with any story, it is crucial to consider multiple perspectives and verify the accuracy of the claims made.
Only time will reveal the truth behind these controversial allegations and shed light on Meghan’s true character and intentions.