In a recent revelation, it has been disclosed that Prince William will have a significant role at his father’s upcoming coronation, while Prince Harry has been left out.

According to the liturgy of the coronation service, after the Archbishop of Canterbury pledges his allegiance to King Charles III on Saturday, the Prince of Wales will follow suit.

Prince William, 40, will kneel before his father, who will already be crowned, and place his hands between the kings, reciting the homage of royal blood.

This makes him the only member of the royal family who will have a speaking capacity during the ceremony.

On the other hand, Prince Harry’s absence from the liturgy means he will not have an official role in the coronation.

Speculation arises regarding whether he will even attend the event.

If he chooses not to show up, it could have negative consequences for his image on the world stage.

Considering the recent controversies surrounding him, such as the court filings and testimony, as well as the Queen’s funeral, his presence among the royals could potentially create further tensions.

Some argue that it would be better if he stayed away, as there seems to be little desire for his attendance.

Critics express their disapproval of Prince Harry’s participation in the ceremony, citing his perceived lack of deservingness and entitlement.

They question why taxpayers should fund the attendance of a non-working royal who continues to sue the government and police for financial benefits.

Moreover, his apparent disdain for his family, palace staff, journalists, the UK, and Commonwealth traditions adds fuel to the fire.

Some speculate that the only reason he was invited is to capture a photograph of Prince Charles with both his sons, for the sake of historical documentation.

By choosing to skip the event, Prince Harry risks erasing himself from this historical record.

It is believed that Prince Harry’s decision to keep the family guessing about his attendance is a strategic move to outmaneuver any plans they may have for him.

This tactic was previously observed at Prince Philip’s funeral, where he deliberately moved closer to Prince William instead of remaining on the other side of Peter Phillips.

His disruptive behavior in public settings has proven challenging for event organizers, who must navigate his unpredictable actions.

Buckingham Palace had previously confirmed that the Duke of Sussex, 38, would attend the coronation without his wife Meghan Markle and their children.

Instead, Meghan will remain in Montecito, California, to celebrate their son Archie’s fourth birthday.

This decision was met with understanding, as it is natural for a mother to prioritize her child’s special day.

However, it is unfortunate that Archie and his sister Lilibet, nicknamed Lily, will not be present for such a historic occasion, especially considering their recent updates on the line of succession.

Despite her absence, Meghan Markle, 41, still managed to secure a spot in the coronation souvenir program, which has sparked criticism.

Some find it hard to believe that she would pass up an opportunity to showcase herself on the world stage and instead choose to celebrate her son’s birthday privately.

Meghan’s unpopularity in her husband’s home country is widely acknowledged, and it is speculated that she would face significant backlash if she were to make an appearance.

In conclusion, Prince William is set to play a significant role in his father’s coronation, while Prince Harry’s involvement has been excluded from the liturgy.

The decision of whether or not Prince Harry will attend the event remains uncertain, and his absence could further strain the already tense relations within the royal family.

Meanwhile, Meghan Markle will stay in the US to celebrate their son Archie’s birthday, which has drawn mixed reactions.

The anticipation for this historic occasion continues to build, as the world waits to see how the events unfold.